Dr. Orly Taitz reports that her case, Noonan v Bowen, was submitted to Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts.
Dr. Taitz's headline posted at her blog reads: "BREAKING NEWS, CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JOHN ROBERTS TO RULE ON NOONAN, MACLERAN, JUDD, TAITZ V BOWEN"
I suspect this is normal operating procedure when a case is re-submitted for review. My guess is the outcome will be the same.
Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al: Dr. Orly Taitz Attempts To Subpoena Obama And Other Top Officials For The January 3rd Electoral Challenge Hearing
As reported here a California judge scheduled a hearing to rule on whether to stop Congress from certifying Obama's electoral votes. In preparation for the hearing Taitz issued numerous subpoenas seeking to compel top officials to appear at the hearing. The individuals subpoenaed include Barack Obama, House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, Selective Service System Director Lawrence Romo, Social Security Administration Commissioner Michael Astrue, and Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe.
Sibley said: “Let me strip away the legal gobbledygook and speak plainly: Obama doth protest too much, methinks. There comes a point when Judge Bates should not be ignorant as a judge of what he knows as a man.1 Unless everyone wants to behave like ostriches, we cannot ignore the mounting evidence of Mr. Obama’s ineligibility to be President. Simply stated, what is Mr. Obama hiding and why he is so fearful that his 20th Century records will be released? James Madison said: ‘A popular Government, without popular information or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy, or perhaps both.’ I fear we are at Madison’s long-ago predicted Prologue.” - E n d -
'At this point you can begin to make a case for treason'
As many news sites and pundits break down the biggest stories of 2012, one story too big to miss has been resurrected by the website TeaParty.org, a story at least one national pundit believes could send Barack Obama to prison.
The tea-party site posted a Glenn Beck video from October in which the TV and radio host insisted a case for treason could be built against President Obama for his role in the attack of Sept. 11, 2012, in which armed Libyans captured and killed U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three others at an American diplomatic mission in Benghazi.
“This president is lying to you about Benghazi in such spectacular fashion that I believe people will go to prison,” Beck said on the Blaze TV broadcast of his radio show. “This is impeachable; the president might go to prison for this one.”
Beck cited evidence that Ambassador Stevens had been helping arm Arab Spring rebels in Libya and Syria, rebel forces that included al-Qaida operatives and a heavy Muslim Brotherhood influence.
Yet when those same forces turned on the diplomatic mission and overran it, killing Ambassador Stevens, the Obama administration initially suggested it could have been the result instead of mass, popular protests run amuck over a YouTube video critical of Islam’s prophet, Muhammad.
Despite evidence the attacking forces on Sept. 11 were organized and heavily armed, and later evidence the “popular uprisings” were non-existent, the White House was reluctant to attribute the attacks to terrorism.
In the Blaze TV video, Beck proposed a reason for the misinformation from Washington.
“Can you imagine a scandal, if it were to come out, that Obama supplied the terrorists, our enemies, with weapons to attack and kill our own embassy and ambassador?” Beck asked.
“This is why the White House covered, because our ambassador was killed by a guy we were running guns to and we are still running guns today,” Beck said. “Russia Today is verifying that U.S. Stinger missiles are in the hands of the Syrian rebels, the Syrian rebels which are connected to al-Qaida and the Muslim Brotherhood. We also have a report now from the New York Times that we are using the Muslim Brotherhood to arm the rebels in Syria.
“This president is on the wrong side,” Beck concluded. “It is so crystal clear, that at this point you can begin to make a case for treason.”
