Freedom First!'s Blog Has Moved

The blog for Freedom First! has moved to a new web address, I'm sorry for the inconvenience, but save the new one in your favorites. I'm still posting and updating the blog, it just has a new address. It also has a slightly new look, and hopefully I'm finding new ways to update it here and there.

http://buttonknowsbests.blogspot.com/

Attorney Larry Klayman Fires Back Filing Motion For Emergency Rehearing In Florida Electoral Challenge

Plaintiff's Reply In Support Of Expedited Motion For Rehearing

Plaintiff Michael Voeltz, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files his Reply in Support of Expedited Motion for Rehearing on an emergency basis, as time is extremely short before the electoral college votes on January 6, 2013.

First, Defendant Obama's "argument" that Plaintiff did not request a hearing is absurd and frivolous. Indeed, in Plaintiff's Emergency Response to the Court's Order of December 13, 2012 it states plainly that he did request a hearing and once Plaintiff filed the Motion for Temporary Injunction, an evidentiary one as well. However, the court’s hastily crafted precipitous Order Dismissing Complaint was an obvious attempt to extinguish Plaintiff's right to any hearing, evidentiary or otherwise.

Second, contrary to the potentially politically motivated decisions of three judges of this Court, Section 102.168, Florida Statutes, plainly provides that Plaintiff does have a right to contest eligibility and candidate fraud in this Court.

Third, the role of the Electoral College is not in lieu of Florida law but complimentary to Florida law. It is axiomatic and constitutionally sacrosanct that states have rights; this should come as no surprise to anyone who has read the Florida and U.S. Constitutions, in particular in the 10th Amendment. The state obviously has a right and a duty to police candidacy fraud and ineligibility before its voters are lead down the primrose path to voter nullification by dishonest candidates for either state or federal office. In this case, involving defendant Barack H. Obama, federal law does not take precedence over clear cut unambiguous, and black letter Florida statutory law for the following reasons: [...] - Hat tip George Miller @ OBC2012.

MOTION CONTINUED BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/118082460

PREVIOUS REPORTS HERE: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/search?q=Voeltz+Obama
Voeltz v Obama - Motion For Emergency Hearing - Florida Obama Electoral Challenge - 12/26/2012 For original article go to:http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/12/attorney-klayman-files-motion-for-rehearing.html

Team Obama (U.S. Atty.) Seeks More Time To Quash California Subpoenas

As reported here Dr. Orly Taitz subpoenaed numerous individuals involved in the Grinols v. Electoral College including Barack Obama. The U.S. Attorney just filed a motion to extend time for responding to the subpoenas and filed the opposition to the motion for a temporary restraining order to halt the electoral count. Last week a hearing was set for January 3rd, 2013. EXCERPTS:

DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR RESPONDING TO PLAINTIFFS’ SUBPOENAS

First, you have not delivered a copy of each subpoena to the persons named in the subpoenas, as required by of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(b)(1). Instead, you have simply mailed by Federal Express copies of your subpoenas to either the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Hawaii (in the case of your subpoena to the President) or to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia (in the case of your subpoenas to the Commissioner of Social Security, the Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service, and the Director of Selective Service). In the case of your subpoena to Darrell Issa, your subpoena does not reflect any service whatsoever.

Second, with the exception of the President (who is a named party), the subpoenas require the named individuals to travel more than 100 miles to the place specified for production of documents. Such a requirement in a subpoena to a non-party is prohibited absent court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(b)(2)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(c (3)(A)(ii).

Third, you have not provided “a reasonable time to comply” with the subpoenas, in violation of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(c)(3)(A)(i). This objection applies equally to all of the subpoenas, but is particularly egregious in the case of the subpoena directed to Darrell Issa because the subpoena was issued on December 24, 2012, was not served on Mr. Issa, and directs him to produce documents by 5:00 pm on December 26, 2012.

Fourth, the subpoenas would require the disclosure of documents prohibited from disclosure by the Privacy Act. See 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b); Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(c)(3)(A (iii).

Fifth, the subpoenas subject all of the named persons to an undue burden because: (1) the plaintiffs named in your underlying lawsuit – Grinols v. Electoral College, 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD – lack standing to sue, (2) the claims are barred by the Speech or Debate Clause, and (3) the claims are barred by the political question doctrine.

Sixth, you do not appear to have made any attempt to comply with any of the agencies’ Touhy regulations in connection with your subpoenas. See Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462, 464-65 (1951). [...]

Federal Defendants intend to file a formally noticed motion to quash the subpoenas forthwith and hereby ask the Court to extend the deadline for responding to the subpoenas until after the Court disposes of the motion to quash the subpoenas. [...]

MOTION CONTINUED BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/118079864

There's more to the article here: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/12/obama-seeks-more-time-to-quash-subpoenas.html

Liberty and Union, Now and Forever

The history of Liberty is a history of the limitations of governmental power not the increase of it. — Woodrow Wilson

Developing: U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts To Rule On Obama Eligibility Case

Developing: U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice 

John Roberts To Rule On Obama Eligibility Case?

Dr. Orly Taitz reports that her case, Noonan v Bowen, was submitted to Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts.

Dr. Taitz's headline posted at her blog reads: "BREAKING NEWS, CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JOHN ROBERTS TO RULE ON NOONAN, MACLERAN, JUDD, TAITZ V BOWEN"

I suspect this is normal operating procedure when a case is re-submitted for review. My guess is the outcome will be the same.

SCOTUS Docket Listing for the case:

For original article go to: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/12/supreme-court-to-rule-on-obama-eligibility.html

Dr. Taitz Attempts To Subpoena Obama & Other Top Officials For Electoral Challenge Hearing

Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al: Dr. Orly Taitz Attempts To Subpoena Obama And Other Top Officials For The January 3rd Electoral Challenge Hearing

As reported here a California judge scheduled a hearing to rule on whether to stop Congress from certifying Obama's electoral votes. In preparation for the hearing Taitz issued numerous subpoenas seeking to compel top officials to appear at the hearing. The individuals subpoenaed include Barack Obama, House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, Selective Service System Director Lawrence Romo, Social Security Administration Commissioner Michael Astrue, and Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe.

OBAMA SUBPOENA BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/118045976

CASE DETAILS: California Judge Sets Hearing For TRO Enjoining Congress From Certifying Obama’s Votes - CLICK HERE.
Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al - Obama Subpoena For California Electoral Challenge Hearing - 12/2...
For original article go to: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/12/taitz-attempts-to-subpoena-obama.html

Team Obama Freaks: Seeks To Stop Discovery; Obama Subpoena Imposes Undue Burden

Team Obama Freaks: Seeks To Stop Discovery; 

Obama Subpoena Imposes Undue Burden

OBAMA FREAKS: SEEKS TO STOP SIBLEY AND SUPPRESS SIBLEY’S SUBPOENAS

WASHINGTON D.C. - A clearly panicked and desperate Barack Hussein Obama, II has dispatched his lawyers to intervene in Montgomery Blair Sibley’s Electoral College lawsuit to stop Sibley’s subpoenas from revealing information which could prove devastating to Mr. Obama. Ironically wearing the veil of the United States, Mr. Obama’s lawyers filed on his behalf their Motion of the United States for a Stay of Discovery Or, Alternatively, to Quash Subpoenas and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, to Stay All Discovery, and for Sanctions.

In Response, Sibley has filed his: Response to Motion of The United States to Stay Discovery Or Quash Subpoenas andPlaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Reply to Defendants’ Omnibus Response.

Sibley said: “Let me strip away the legal gobbledygook and speak plainly: Obama doth protest too much, methinks. There comes a point when Judge Bates should not be ignorant as a judge of what he knows as a man.1 Unless everyone wants to behave like ostriches, we cannot ignore the mounting evidence of Mr. Obama’s ineligibility to be President. Simply stated, what is Mr. Obama hiding and why he is so fearful that his 20th Century records will be released? James Madison said: ‘A popular Government, without popular information or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy, or perhaps both.’ I fear we are at Madison’s long-ago predicted Prologue.” - E n d -

FULL MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/118031611

RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/118034208

Previous reports on Mr. Sibley's case here: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/search?q=montgomery+sibley
Sibley v. Alexander - Obama Motion To Stay Discovery - Obama Electoral Challenge - 12/25/2012For original article go to: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/12/obama-seeks-to-stop-discovery.html

GLENN BECK: OBAMA DESTINED FOR PRISON?

'At this point you can begin to make a case for treason'

As many news sites and pundits break down the biggest stories of 2012, one story too big to miss has been resurrected by the website TeaParty.org, a story at least one national pundit believes could send Barack Obama to prison.

The tea-party site posted a Glenn Beck video from October in which the TV and radio host insisted a case for treason could be built against President Obama for his role in the attack of Sept. 11, 2012, in which armed Libyans captured and killed U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three others at an American diplomatic mission in Benghazi.

“This president is lying to you about Benghazi in such spectacular fashion that I believe people will go to prison,” Beck said on the Blaze TV broadcast of his radio show. “This is impeachable; the president might go to prison for this one.”

Beck cited evidence that Ambassador Stevens had been helping arm Arab Spring rebels in Libya and Syria, rebel forces that included al-Qaida operatives and a heavy Muslim Brotherhood influence.

Yet when those same forces turned on the diplomatic mission and overran it, killing Ambassador Stevens, the Obama administration initially suggested it could have been the result instead of mass, popular protests run amuck over a YouTube video critical of Islam’s prophet, Muhammad.

Despite evidence the attacking forces on Sept. 11 were organized and heavily armed, and later evidence the “popular uprisings” were non-existent, the White House was reluctant to attribute the attacks to terrorism.

In the Blaze TV video, Beck proposed a reason for the misinformation from Washington.

“Can you imagine a scandal, if it were to come out, that Obama supplied the terrorists, our enemies, with weapons to attack and kill our own embassy and ambassador?” Beck asked.

“This is why the White House covered, because our ambassador was killed by a guy we were running guns to and we are still running guns today,” Beck said. “Russia Today is verifying that U.S. Stinger missiles are in the hands of the Syrian rebels, the Syrian rebels which are connected to al-Qaida and the Muslim Brotherhood. We also have a report now from the New York Times that we are using the Muslim Brotherhood to arm the rebels in Syria.

“This president is on the wrong side,” Beck concluded. “It is so crystal clear, that at this point you can begin to make a case for treason.”

Video of Beck’s comments can be seen below:

The White House reaction to Benghazi – and the mainstream media’s coverage of it – has been so fraught with misinformation that WND chose the scandal as “The Biggest Lie of 2012.”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/glenn-beck-obama-destined-for-prison/#EJMXFrIJT8wilIt0.99

Piers Morgan vs Larry Pratt – watch the fur fly

Piers Morgan, host of the CNN show Piers Morgan Tonight, had as a guest on his show Larry Pratt, the Executive Director of Gun Owners of America. The debate was spirited and Mr. Pratt came out on top. Here’s the transcript (video available at the source):

PIERS MORGAN, HOST: The AR-15, as we’ve now seen from the last three mass shootings in America, Aurora, the shopping mall in Oregon, and now at Sandy Hook school, is the preferred choice of weapon for disturbed young men who want to commit mass atrocity, can fire hundreds of bullets at rapid speed, if you have the right magazines.

The president of the United States has indicated he wants to ban assault weapons like this. What is your view?

LARRY PRATT, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA: I think we need to ban gun control laws that keep people from being able to protect themselves. The problem is not going to go away if we ban this or that gun. We’ve tried that. That doesn’t work. Doesn’t even work in England. You have mass murders there all over Europe. There have been mass murderers.

MORGAN: You’re talking complete and utter — you are talking complete and utter nonsense.

PRATT: The solution is for people to be able to defend themselves at the point of the crime and not wait for 20 minutes for the police to come after everybody is dead.

MORGAN: What you’ve just said, Mr. Pratt, was an absolute lie. The gun murder rate in countries like Britain or Germany or Australia, who’ve all suffered massacres many years ago, similar nature, have — there are 35 people killed a year. Your country has 12,000.

PRATT: Your murder rate has — your murder rate is lower than ours, that is true. Your violent –

MORGAN: Lower? It’s 75 against 12,000 in Australia.

PRATT: Your violent crime rate –

MORGAN: They had a massacre. And they got rid of these assault weapons.

PRATT: Your violent crime rate is higher than ours as is the violent crime rate in Australia. America is not the Wild West that you are depicting. We only have the problem in our cities, and unhappily, in our schools where people like you have been able to get laws put on the books that keep people from being able to defend themselves.

I honestly don’t understand why you would rather have people be victims of a crime than be able to defend themselves. It’s incomprehensible.

MORGAN: You’re an unbelievably stupid man, aren’t you?

PRATT: It seems to me that you’re morally obtuse. You seem to prefer being a victim to being able to prevail over the criminal element. And I don’t know why you want to be the criminal’s friend.

MORGAN: What a ridiculous argument. You have absolutely no coherent argument whatsoever. You don’t — you don’t actually give –

PRATT: You have no –

MORGAN: You don’t give a damn, do you, about the gun murder rate in America? You don’t actually care. All you care about –

PRATT: It seems to me that facts don’t bother you, do they, Mr. Morgan?

MORGAN: — is the right for any — Americans — you would like to see –

(CROSSTALK)

PRATT: Facts seem to — they bounce right off of your head.Read more here

Letter to my Liberal Daughter

Dear Sweet Daughter of mine, whom I love so much,

It is with great trepidation that I write this to you. I have failed you as a parent. I have failed you as a mother and a patriot. It may seem odd that I would write you a letter about this, but it seems that this may be the only medium that I might actually get through to you as any time that I have tried to talk to you about the state of our great Nation it has only gotten shot down with a barrage of insults and ridicule. I hope that this helps you to understand the dire straits that the United States of America is in before it is too late. And hopefully I am writing this to you in time for you and others to act to preserve our freedom before there is nothing anyone can do to win this silent war.

You see, I neglected to teach you about the U.S. Constitution, you know, the one that starts off with "We the People of the United States" and continues with "in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." I haven't adequately taught you how important our Constitution is, or the Bill of Rights for that matter. Nor did I teach you that once you start chipping away at our freedoms, eventually it will be too easy to toss out the Constitution altogether, because it only gets in the way of creating new laws that seem to help all people. Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't teach you about Communism either.

But you already know all about Communism, you and your party constituents are calling it Socialism right now, but lately it is leaning more towards Communism than Socialism. Aw, heck, it helps people right? People who are too ignorant or poor, or downtrodden to go out and provide for themselves. But that's one of the tenets of Communism: get more people dependent on the government for their very subsistence so they have no choice but to vote for more government. We're already there, and it won't be long before Big Government intrudes in our lives more than they already are. Heck, we see it every day more and more: redistribution of wealth, the delegitimization of faith, erosion of moral fabric and death taxes that will not only strip the right to inherit money, but property as well. The same death tax that will effectively end a legacy of farms from continuing, historic farms that will have to be broken up and sold off to non-family members just to pay the exorbitant death tax when a loved one dies. You see, the farms are land rich, but not cash rich. You know the ones, farms that have been in the family for years but on paper are worth a lot of money, but even though they are successful and are self-sufficient, would be stopped dead in their tracks when the patriarch/matriarch passes away.

I've failed because I haven't adequately taught you to be a good judge of character. You were so certain that Obama was a good man, you voted for him because my candidate would've taken away some of your prosperity because of the fear of entitlement reform. Or did you vote for him simply because he was black. Or maybe it was because there are so many in your generation that thought, erroneously, that Romney was too old, and that he had nothing to offer your generation. I voted for Romney because he was a man of character, integrity, honesty, and because he balanced Massachusetts budget while he was governor of that state. What did Obama do? I mean, that's positive. Let's set aside Fast and Furious, Benghazi, and Osama Bin Laden. We won't talk about how Obama's policies armed the Al Qaeda and the Libyan rebels, or that he was the one responsible for ordering the stand down at Benghazi so that Al Qaeda could finish carrying out their 9/11 memorial jihad. And we won't mention that Barack HUSSEIN Obama's policies are the reason this country remains divided even after the most divisive Presidential Campaign in the history of our great Nation. Or that many of Obama's campaign donations came from Muslim countries that already have in place Sharia Law.

Let's talk about the positive things that Obama has done. The ones that aren't communistic I mean..... Obamacare doesn't count, it IS communistic and it is destructive to our nation's economy, not to mention it tramples our Constitutional Rights. Oh sorry, but that's just an inconvenience, our Constitution keeps getting in the way of what Obama wants to get down, he even said that on the record. Okay, when you can come up with something good Obama has done for our country I'm willing to listen. I'll probably laugh at you, like you taught me you like to do when I voice my opinion, but I'll listen.

And it's also my fault that I haven't taught you think objectively, you think you do, but it seems like you and so many from your generation who believes they are independent minded, just repeat verbatim what the mainstream media spouts at you. You refuse to believe that CNN, PBS and NPS are in the pocket of the government, and several other networks, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, willingly report biased news that favors the White House. Oh what? You don't think that could happen here? It is happening here, and more. I have not taught you to look at the facts, not the mainstream media biased facts, you know, those pesky ones that keep popping up in the media, the ones that the news staff just giggle at which discounts the truth but doesn't make it any less true. Either that or they just don't report on the facts.

Like for instance: did you know that one of the first Executive Orders that Obama signed was one that sealed all his records, his college records, his passport, everything and anything that could have corroborated his citizenship. So far the only document that proves Barack HUSSEIN Obama is a U.S. Citizenship is his forged birth certificate. Oh but, he has a birth certificate right? Well, so far that's it. He also has school records that state he was an exchange student from Indonesia, he has a birth certificate from Mombasa, Kenya, and no one from his class at Columbia even remembers him, not one person. So there is still the matter of corroboration of the birth certificate. It can't be done. But there are people who remember a black Indonesian foreigner who stated that he was going to be President of the United States someday.

And yet you are still confused. Have you even heard of the Manchurian Candidate? It was a book published in 1959 by Richard Condon. It was about a conspiracy to overthrow the government and form a Communist government and control the country. The only problem is that it would take a lot of money, and just the right people to pull it off. The sad thing is that, with the right expertise and enough time, like a few decades, it can actually be done. Obama is the perfect Manchurian, the unwitting but willing pawn in the game. You see, Obama is not really our president, he is just a puppet dictator. Someone else actually controls him. He just does what he's supposed to do. All the while Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals comes in handy to control the unwitting masses, the ones who stopped thinking for themselves. And that pesky Constitution keeps getting in the way. And never letting a good crisis go to waste, which is another way of describing Alinsky Rule 10: "If you push a negative hard enough, it will become a positive." Or in other words, destroy the 2nd Amendment after the Sandy Hook Massacre so that our people can live without violence. (or at least until they come for the next freedom the Communistic government wants to take away.) After the 2nd Amendment is destroyed, it will be so easy to take away the 1st Amendment, and that pesky Constitution can be abolished altogether. "Freedom? What freedom? We'll tell you what you want, what you need, and if we think you deserve it, the government will give it to you. Communism is going to be so much better for you."

It's because I love you that I have to admit that I'm a failure as a mother, as a parent, as a patriot. I know I'm getting old, and it won't be long before senior citizen euthenasia (through United Nations Agenda 21) will implemented here, they're already trying it out on sick infants elderly in the UK, and I don't have long to wait before I qualify for the death panel, so you won't have me around to teach you what's really important in life. Because if I haven't already taught you that living in the United States of America is one of the best places to live, or that Freedom of Speech is worth defending, or that when they come to take my guns, they'll have to pry them from my cold, dead fingers, then I haven't taught you enough. But these are already things you do not want to hear, you and your contemporaries already know what's best. It seems that wisdom from our elders and sages are now only old wive's tales (or stories from old white men as it were) and none of that is relevant to our society now. Never mind that our founding fathers knew that our country might someday be in this position, that's why certain provisions and wording was included in the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights, and that they knew someday we would need that wisdom, but you know what you want. A bankrupt government with half of its citizens on entitlements, a military that's being dismantled by our own government in preparation for the impending collapse, and an Executive Branch of government that is controlled by the Chicago mob. But you know best. At the very least, I hope I die soon so that I won't have to see my precious country demolished from within, very soon.

http://billofrightsinstitute.org/founding-documents/constitution/
http://billofrightsinstitute.org/founding-documents/bill-of-rights/
http://www.westernjournalism.com/watch-joe-arpaios-press-conference-live/
http://www.wnd.com/2008/10/79411/
http://www.forbes.com/sites/merrillmatthews/2012/11/07/the-era-of-big-government-is-back/
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/08/03/Obama-administration-paves-the-way-for-sharia-law
http://www.bestofbeck.com/wp/activism/saul-alinskys-12-rules-for-radicals

The Deadly Israeli House

-By Daniel Greenfield, Canada Free Press

There are few weapons as deadly as the Israeli house. When its bricks and mortar are combined together, the house, whether it is one of those modest one story hilltop affairs or a five floor apartment building complete with hot and cold running water, becomes far more dangerous than anything green and glowing that comes out of the Iranian centrifuges.

Forget the cluster bomb and the mine, the poison gas shell and even tailored viruses. Iran can keep its nuclear bombs. They don’t impress anyone in Europe or in Washington DC. Genocide is equally not worthy of attention when in the presence of the fearsome weapon of terror that is an Israeli family of four moving into a new apartment downwind from Jerusalem.

Sudan’s small mountain of African corpses

Sudan may have built a small mountain of African corpses, but it can’t expect to command the full and undivided attention of the world until it does something truly outrageous like building a house and filling it with Jews. Since the Sudanese Jews are as gone as the Jews of Egypt, Iraq, Syria and good old Afghanistan, the chances of Bashir the Butcher pulling off that trick are rather slim.

Due to the Muslim world’s shortsightedness in driving out its Jews from Cairo, Aleppo and Baghdad to Jerusalem, the ultimate weapon in international affairs is entirely controlled by the Jewish State. The Jewish State’s stockpile of Jews should worry the international community far more than its hypothetical stockpiles of nuclear weapons. No one besides Israel, and possibly Saudi Arabia, cares much about the Iranian bomb. But when Israel builds a house, then the international community tears its clothes, wails, threatens to recall its ambassadors and boycott Israeli peaches.

You can spit on the White House carpets and steal all the gold in Greece. You can blow up anything you like and threaten anyone you will, but you had better not lift a drill near Gilgal, where Joshua and a few million escaped Hebrew slaves pitched their camp.

Some may think that genocide or nuclear weapons are the ultimate weapons, but as we see, time and time again, the ultimate weapon is a hammer and a fistful of nails in a Jewish hand. How can even the most talented Iranian nuclear scientist hope to compete with the humble tools of a Jewish carpenter?

Obama has yet to respond to the Muslim Brotherhood coup in Egypt.

Obama has yet to respond to the Muslim Brotherhood coup in Egypt. The gangs of paid rapists assaulting women in Tahrir Square on behalf of the Sharia state are nothing for the White House to worry about. Tunisian protesters against Islamist rule are losing their eyes, but Tunisian eyes come and go, Jewish houses are forever. Read the rest of the article here: